Grant Proposal Quality Assurance, in Plain English
Guides on the one thing that decides funding rounds: whether your application answers the criteria the panel scores against. Below, the scoring grids of the funds our users actually apply to, and the practice behind writing for them.
What is Evalora? Grant proposal quality assurance, explained
The one-sentence answer, how the evaluation engine works end to end, and who it is built for. The best first read if you are new here.
Read the overview
Grant applications, evaluation and approval
Grant applications and project proposals for NGOs
Choosing the right call, reading the guidelines, partners and budget, and the check before you submit.
Read the guide GuideHow to get a grant approved: the approval process explained
Eligibility, score and rank: the three gates to grant approval and how to move above the funding line.
Read the guide GuideGrant proposal evaluation: criteria and how to self-evaluate
The criteria evaluators use and a six step method to evaluate your own application against the call.
Read the guideFunding programmes, criterion by criterion
Erasmus+ KA2 evaluation criteria explained
The four award criteria, how KA220 and KA210 differ, and the minimum every criterion has to reach on its own.
Read the guide FundingRYCO open call: what it funds and what gets selected
Who can apply across the WB6, how selection really works, and where applications fall short.
Read the guide FundingWestern Balkans Fund: who it funds and how it judges
The grant ceiling, the mandatory co-financing, the three-country partnership rule, and what decides the score.
Read the guide FundingInternational Visegrad Fund grants explained
Visegrad, Visegrad+ and Strategic Grants compared: partnerships, grant sizes, the 15 percent overhead cap and the deadlines.
Read the guide FundingCEI Cooperation Fund: small grants, a high bar
What it finances, who can apply, and why a proposal that is good on every criterion still misses the bar.
Read the guide FundingHorizon Europe evaluation criteria and scoring
Excellence, Impact and Implementation, the minimum each has to clear, and why weighting decides the ranking.
Read the guideGuides and comparisons
Eva, the AI grant advisor built into Evalora
An advisor wired into the Evalora Engine that knows your call criteria, your score and your organisation.
Meet Eva ComparisonCan ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini evaluate your proposal?
Six structural reasons general AI models cannot score an application, and a two-minute test on your own draft.
Read the comparison GuideHow grant evaluators actually score proposals
What happens after you submit, how evaluators really read, and the language that ends up in your report.
Read the guide ChecklistThe pre-submission checklist: 40 checks
Eligibility, criteria coverage, impact evidence, budget, partners and document mechanics, grouped by when to run them.
Open the checklist GuideGrant proposal quality assurance: the complete guide
What QA actually means, why it decides who gets funded, and the five-step pass you can run on any proposal.
Read the guide GuideWhy grant proposals get rejected, and how to prevent it
The five patterns that sink strong projects, and the fix for each one, before a panel ever sees them.
Read the guide ComparisonEvalora vs ChatGPT for grant proposals
One writes, one scores against the criteria. A side-by-side look at what each is actually built for.
Compare them ComparisonThe best grant proposal tools in 2026
AI writers, review platforms and human consultants, compared across drafting, compliance and evaluation.
See the comparisonScore your proposal before you submit
Upload your funding call and draft, and see exactly where your application falls short.
Start Free Trial